🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam ruling, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a revised congressional map that may create up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a district court's block that had rejected the new map in November.

Justices' Rationale

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its action.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to employ the districts drawn after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's action. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Fight

This decision occurs during a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party leaders decried the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A top House figure said the court had once again damaged its credibility by rubber-stamping a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.